How to Get Everything from Nothing | CEH

In keeping with Mainline Science, Nothing Advanced into The whole lot!
Science fails to get across the biggest drawback in evolution


by Jerry Bergman, PhD

The quilt story of the most recent challenge of Science Focus introduced in daring letters they’d the  solutions to the best mysteries of the universe.[1] The lead article that caught my consideration requested, “Why is there one thing fairly than nothing?”[2] This can be a “bedrock query” in science.[3] The article was tailored from the creator’s best-selling e-book, What a Fantastic World: One Man’s Try to Clarify the Massive Stuff (2013).[4] Marcus Chown additionally has a YouTube video on his concept that the universe got here from nothing, explaining how nothing created the whole lot.[5]

The one empirical proof that the universe got here from nothing is the well-documented discovering that the universe is increasing. If the enlargement occasion is reversed, it brings us again to the primordial egg that began all of it. The conundrum then is, the place did the primordial egg come from? The answer accepted by many main cosmologists is, it got here from nothing. Thus the reasoning is that nothing finally created the whole lot.

A well-known cartoon by Sidney Harris mocks the faith of materialism.

Halt! Violation

Probably the most significant issue is that this clarification violates the first legislation of thermodynamics, which says matter can neither be created nor destroyed. This absolute legislation, the very best affirmed legislation in science, acknowledges that matter might be modified from one type to a different, however can’t be created nor destroyed by pure processes. Einstein’s equation E=mc2 modifies this legislation to state that the overall quantity of vitality and matter within the universe stays fixed, merely altering from one type, matter to a different, vitality.[6]

Moreover, the legislation states that the universe itself is a closed system, so the overall quantity of matter+vitality in existence has all the time been the identical all through all of historical past. The varieties that matter and vitality take, nonetheless, are consistently altering.

To postulate that nothing created the whole lot, one should one way or the other get round this primary legislation of thermodynamics. One should additionally conclude that one way or the other, not solely matter popped into existence, however area, time, and vitality did as properly. Concurrently, the 4 pure forces believed by mainstream physics to carry matter collectively, specifically gravity, electromagnetism (electrical and magnetism), the robust and weak nuclear forces, should additionally one way or the other pop into existence. All of those eight realities should first exist for the universe to exist.

Some would classify the universe as the one “infinite system” and, due to this fact neither closed, remoted, nor open. Others counter that the whole universe have to be an “remoted system” separate from the atmosphere of ‘hyperspace’ as a result of it’s increasing and, due to this fact, it can’t be infinite. Nonetheless others argue that solely the observable universe have to be thought-about an “open system” affecting and affected by the unobservable universe.

How are the issues of the nothing produced the whole lot declare solved?

In brief, materialists clear up these issues by ignoring them or obfuscating. Professor Chown, in reply to “Why is there one thing fairly than nothing?” defined: “To start with, in line with the usual image of cosmology, was the ‘inflationary vacuum.’ It had a super-high vitality density and repulsive gravity, inflicting it to increase.”[7] Apparent questions in response to this declare embody the place did the super-high vitality density come from? Moreover, what’s an inflationary vacuum? By definition, a vacuum is area devoid of matter, from the Latin adjective vacuus for “vacant” or “void.” Thus, an inflationary vacuum is an oxymoron, a determine of speech containing two phrases that contradict one another, like being alone collectively, or large shrimp. Likewise, repulsive gravity or antigravity, outlined as a hypothetical drive opposing gravity, has been hunted for eons however by no means discovered.[8] This final idea can be defined by the plasma cosmology notion that claims gravity is not a basic drive however is definitely an electromagnetic phenomena which, after all, might be both a lovely drive or repulsive drive. This concept can be problematic.

Chown continues: “This vacuum was unpredictable. At random places, it decayed.” How can area devoid of matter decay? Chown continues, speculating that the “great vitality [which popped into existence] of the inflationary vacuum needed to go someplace. [Why didn’t it just remain energy?] And it went into creating matter and heating it to a blisteringly excessive temperature into creating huge bangs. Our universe is merely one such Massive Bang bubble within the ever-expanding inflationary vacuum.” The conundrum that must be requested is, “How can a vacuum create vitality?” And what proof exists to imagine there many Massive Bangs existed which have created multi-universes, an concept that has by no means been proved and can’t be proved?[9] Considered one of a number of causes the multiverse can’t be proved is as a result of the universe consists of, by definition, the whole lot that exists, together with the universe-generating system, no matter it’s.[10]

The Multiverse and QM Escape Plots

Moreover, we aren’t even capable of view the tip of the universe we reside in, and, assuming the a number of universes are separate, we’re thus unable to view their origin and demise as properly. The principle cause the multiverse idea was developed is as a result of the identified universe is fine-tuned to an improbably excessive diploma to help life. If many universes with totally different parameters exist, it’s consequently extra doubtless that one in every of them advanced to help life.

Moreover, Chown speculates, the whole course of might have began “with a mass equal to a bag of sugar.” My points with this assertion embody “The place did the bag-of-sugar mass come from? and “How can we get a universe with 100 billion galaxies, every with 100-million stars, as postulated by cosmologists, from a mass the scale of a bag of sugar?” What we want is a universe, not a mass the scale of a bag of sugar! Chown merely retorts with: “quantum principle allow[s] matter to pop into existence from nothing.”[11]

After this it will get more odd. In reply to “The place did the legal guidelines of physics come from?,” Chown responds, from the “deep symmetries of area and time.” These symmetries can happen in “a completely empty universe.”[12] The Oxford dictionary defines symmetries because the “high quality of being made up of precisely related elements dealing with one another or round an axis.”[13] This doesn’t make sense. It might be that cosmologists are referring to the definition utilized in science, specifically “symmetry as an “object that’s invariant beneath some transformations.”[14] Truly, neither definition is smart. Having taught physics and cosmology on the faculty stage for a few years, this weird esoteric language ignores the principle query, “How did nothing turn into one thing? In conclusion Chown opines, “perhaps the transition from nothing to one thing was not such a giant deal.”[15]

Ignoring the Massive Questions

Such logic of the reasons of how nothing turned the whole lot clearly includes quite a few contradictions and word-salads. Chown’s clarification shouldn’t be a crackpot concept by some fringe pseudoscience author. Nonetheless, it’s baffling how essentially the most eminent cosmologist, the late Steven Hawking, wrote that the reason Chown supplied was to him completely convincing. As Hawking defined, it answered what he thought-about a very powerful questions that people can ask, specifically:

1) “Is there a God?”

2) “How did the universe and life start?” and

3) “Does clever life exist elsewhere within the universe?”

Hawking notes the primary two questions might be answered both by faith or science. He explains that faith was an early try and reply the place all matter and life got here from till science started creating about 200 years in the past. Now, he informs us, science has proven faith to be unsuitable. In  Hawking’s phrases, “science gives higher and extra constant solutions, however individuals will all the time cling to faith, as a result of it offers consolation, and they don’t  . . . perceive science.”[16] Moreover, Hawking believes that we don’t want ‘God’ to elucidate both the existence of the universe or of life; all we want is gravity.[17] Gravity explains the whole lot. The query, then, is how did gravity come into existence?

Cowl of Lawrence M. Krauss’s best-selling e-book. From

One of many main cosmologists of our technology, Lawrence Krauss, produced a 202-page e-book defending “a universe from nothing.”[18] Krauss, referring to the assumption frequent amongst explains that science tells us “a universe with out function or steering could seem … to make life itself meaningless.” Krauss responded by saying “one particular person’s dream is one other particular person’s nightmare.” He provides that “it does not likely matter both means, and what we want for the universe is irrelevant.”[19] In fact, for most individuals it is extremely related as a result of a universe created from nothing, in distinction to a universe created by intelligence, has profound implications for all times. The afterword to Krauss’s e-book by Richard Dawkins promotes the thought of a universe from nothing as being, at the least to him, invigorating, including the universe will ultimately

flatten right into a nothingness that mirrors its starting. Not solely will there be no cosmologists to look out on the universe, there can be nothing for them to see even when they may. Nothing in any respect. Not even atoms. Nothing.[20]

That is the atheists’ worldview. Bleak, with out a permanent function or final which means. To start with was nothing and ultimately can be nothing as properly, nothing for all of eternity; a view in stark distinction to the monotheistic Christian, Muslim and Jewish worldviews.


The selection is both intelligence created the universe or, one way or the other, by some unknown so-far-unexplainable means, it got here out of nothing. The unbridgeable gaps evolution faces embody from non-life to life, from prokaryotes to eukaryotes, from asexual life to sexual life, from invertebrates to vertebrates, and from simian primates to people. The biggest hole is from nothing to the whole lot strictly by blind evolutionary processes working by way of undirected probability over deep time. In distinction, the monotheistic worldviews are purposeful and embody the promise of everlasting (i.e., eternal) life (John 3:16; 1 John 2:25).

“Professing themselves to be sensible, they turned fools” (Romans 1:22) —Ed.


[1][1] Chown, Marcus. 2021. “The Universe’s 7 largest mysteries (and why they’re unsolved).” Science Focus. Situation 359, February 16; the journal comes from Nice Britain and I simply acquired my challenge mid-March 2021.

[2] Chown, 2021, p. 47

[3] Hedin, Eric. 2021. Canceled Science. Seattle, WA: Discovery Press, p. 43.

[4] Chown, Marcus. 2013. What a Fantastic World: One Man’s Try to Clarify the Massive Stuff. London, UK: Faber & Faber.

[5] Chown, Marcus. 2013. “How the universe got here from nothing.” NewScientist Dwell. YouTube video, December 5.

[6] Moskowitz, Clara. 2014. “Reality or Fiction?: Power Can Neither Be Created Nor Destroyed. Is vitality all the time conserved, even within the case of the increasing universe?” Scientific American, August 5.

[7] Chown, 2021, p. 47.

[8] Siegel, Ethan. 2018. “Is Anti-Gravity Actual? Science Is About To Discover Out.” Forbes, October 26.

[9] Goff , Philip. 2021. “Our Inconceivable Existence Is No Proof for a Multiverse. Specialists in chance have noticed a logical flaw in theorists’ reasoning” Scientific American January 10.

[10] Hedin, Eric. 2021. Canceled Science. Seattle, WA: Uncover Institute Press p. 14-15

[11] Chown, 2021, p. 47.

[12] Chown, 2021, p. 47.

[13] Oxford Languages.

[14] “Symmetry.”

[15] Chown, 2021, p. 47.

[16] Hawking, Stephen. 2018. Temporary Solutions to the Massive Questions. New York, NY: Bantam Books, p. 25.


[18]  Krauss, Lawrence M. 2012. A Universe from Nothing: Why There Is One thing Somewhat than Nothing. New York, NY: Atria Books.

[19] Krauss, 2012, p. 181.

[20] Afterword by Richard Dawkins in Krauss, 2012, p. 188 (see Ref. 15).


B.C. cartoon by the late Johnny Hart

Dr. Jerry Bergman has taught biology, genetics, chemistry, biochemistry, anthropology, geology, and microbiology for over 40 years at a number of schools and universities together with Bowling Inexperienced State College, Medical Faculty of Ohio the place he was a analysis affiliate in experimental pathology, and The College of Toledo. He’s a graduate of the Medical Faculty of Ohio, Wayne State College in Detroit, the College of Toledo, and Bowling Inexperienced State College. He has over 1,300 publications in 12 languages and 40 books and monographs. His books and textbooks that embody chapters that he authored are in over 1,500 faculty libraries in 27 nations. Thus far over 80,000 copies of the 40 books and monographs that he has authored or co-authored are in print. For extra articles by Dr Bergman, see his Writer Profile.

(Visited 48 instances, 48 visits in the present day)

Read More


Recent Articles

Related Stories

Leave a Reply